Do you know some #WebSearch that searches the #SmallWeb or #IndependentWeb, something beside the big players?
E.g. I want to get opinions about whether to use or not use assert() within PHP. And I bet there are a couple of posts out there with pros and cons and opinions on general. I'm looking for them.
But general searches only return docs, StackOverflow, etc. …
Konafets
in reply to Daniel Siepmann • • •DevonAgent from DevonThink comes to my mind.
https://www.devontechnologies.com/de/apps/devonagent
DEVONtechnologies | DEVONagent
DEVONtechnologiesDaniel Siepmann
in reply to Konafets • •I couldn't find anything related on their site. Looks like this is a Mac exclusive Desktop Application? Maybe I should have been more clear. I want a web search within my browser. Also best would be “for free” as I don't need it that often and don't want to go the way I tried with #Kagi where I pay way too much for the one to three searches I do per month.
But thanks for pointing that out, it might be helpful for others.
Konafets
in reply to Daniel Siepmann • • •aRubes
in reply to Daniel Siepmann • • •Daniel Siepmann
in reply to aRubes • •foreverliketh.is
in reply to Daniel Siepmann • • •Search My Site - Open source search engine and search as a service for personal and independent websites
searchmysite.netforeverliketh.is
in reply to foreverliketh.is • • •Lieu — webring search engine
lieu.cblgh.orgDaniel Siepmann
in reply to foreverliketh.is • •Thanks, all cool suggestions. But I fear Kagi is the closest. I once subscribed but don't like their pricing. I only have a handful of searches per month, and "$5 /per month
300 searches per month" doesn't match. Using different mails to get 100 searches over and over also wouldn't be nice. I would be happy with a "pay as you go" as they had last year.
All other suggestions don't bring results for my concrete example. I fear they have very small indexes.
Would be cool to see a "independent web" search engine that would not index way too huge pages like StackOverflow or Wikipedia.
Daniel Siepmann
in reply to Daniel Siepmann • •